Who's actions will lead the time to be exactly 12:00 o'clock - Definitely North Korea is contributing and US is not far behind.
North Korea sharply escalated the rhetoric
against its southern rival, claiming it will soon conduct "special
actions" that would reduce South Korea's conservative government to
ashes within minutes.
Monday's threat from the North's military leadership comes amid concerns
that North Korea may be plotting another provocation in the wake of an
unsuccessful rocket launch condemned by the U.N. Security Council as a
violation of a ban against missile activity.
The Doomsday Clock is a symbolic clock face, maintained since 1947 by the board of directors of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists at the University of Chicago. The closer the clock is to midnight, the closer the world is estimated to be to global disaster.
The most recent officially-announced setting — five minutes to midnight (11:55pm) — was made on 10 January 2012. Now time to change it again, may be yes. Reflecting international events dangerous to humankind, the clock's hands have been adjusted twenty times since its inception in 1947, when the clock was initially set to seven minutes to midnight (11:53pm).
Originally, the clock analogy represented the threat of global nuclear war; however, since 2007 it has also reflected climate-changing technologies and "new developments in the life sciences that could inflict irrevocable harm
The Doomsday Clock is a symbolic clock face, maintained since 1947 by the board of directors of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists at the University of Chicago. The closer the clock is to midnight, the closer the world is estimated to be to global disaster. The most recent officially-announced setting — five minutes to midnight (11:55pm) — was made on 10 January 2012.Reflecting international events dangerous to humankind, the clock's hands have been adjusted twenty times since its inception in 1947,when the clock was initially set to seven minutes to midnight (11:53pm). Originally, the clock analogy represented the threat of global nuclear war; however, since 2007 it has also reflected climate-changing technologies and "new developments in the life sciences that could inflict irrevocable harm
No comments:
Post a Comment